Within the last year, both of my kids have bought their own iPod Touches after saving their money (my wife and I covered the last $50 of each purchase). While it’s smart to limit their use, one of the cool things about the kids having technology pretty similar to our iPhones is that we can all play games like Words with Friends against each other.

Our family is a game-playing family. My wife and I have always enjoyed games, and it occurred to us pretty quickly into our parenting life that games, while pretty fun, could be educational, too. Once, on a trip to Las Vegas, I came home with two fat, spongy dice. My son was four at the time and I taught O to roll dice and add up the spots. He enjoyed playing a made-up game of Who Can Role the Highest? while learning simple addition.

So…Words with Friends. I love it. I’m a word guy, have always loved Scrabble, and tend to have 12-15 WwF games going at any one time. (Except right now, because I gave it up for Lent. For real. So don’t challenge me to any games, please.) When my kids realized they could get their own usernames and play against Mom and Dad, we decided that we needed some rules to keep it fair.

Here are our rules:

1. The adults have to hold back a little. Which means I have passed up chances to score 100 points on O by foregoing a Triple Word Score that was practically flashing neon at me. Do we always let our kids win? No way. But we try to make it close and give them opportunities to score big because part of the game is seeing and being able to take advantage of the board. If I’m stealing all the great plays, they won’t have a chance.

2. The kids can cheat…but with conditions. Here’s the deal. WwF is a game that makes it very easy to cheat. I play against adults all the time who, I’m certain, are entering their tiles into one of those third-party apps that list out for them the highest possible word totals. (I’m sorry, but I’m pretty sure you didn’t just pull JOUNCY out of your long-term memory.) This kind of grown-up cheating annoys me. I don’t do it. Call me square or lame-o or whatever, but if I’m going to beat you, I’d like to do it using my brain and not a computer.

BUT, these cheater apps also have some value. They help you learn weird, useful words like QI, KA, XU, etc. So we let our kids use cheater apps when playing against us…but with two conditions. First, they have to know the word it suggests they play (or, if it’s an uncommon word, they have to have played it against us previously). If not, then they must learn the word’s definition and, using the discussion function of the game, message us a sentence that uses the word. This keeps them honest, makes them better at the game, and eventually they’ll learn the meaning of JOUNCY.

(Please use it in a sentence: The potholes made the car ride a bit jouncy for my taste.)

In conclusion, Words with Friends is awesome. Words with your kids is even better.

Competition is fun. Competition + learning is even better.

Explanation:

I found this at my church. It was in a stack of album covers collected by last summer’s youth ministry interns. I don’t know where they got these albums or why they had them. Who can understand the ways of religious teenagers?

Pertinent Details:

The artist’s name is Doug Oldham. The record is called “Holiday Song.” The publisher is Impact Records. Copyright date is 1979.

Back-of-Album Description:

Doug Oldham’s HOLIDAY SONG will make this year a Christmas to remember. A classic work that brings back wonderful memories, it will create warm feelings year after year. Let Doug sing to you about Christmas!

Back-of-Album Description (had I written it):

Doug Oldham’s HOLIDAY SONG will make this year a Christmas so memorable we are discussing it in italics. Even though we have titled this album with a non-specific and vaguely secular description, it should be clear that these are Christmas songs about Jesus because Doug is holding a giant Bible. That thing can barely fit in Doug’s hands. It may, in fact, be crushing his thigh. The little gold foil name stamp on the cover says Rubeus Freaking Hagrid. Also, for obvious reasons, Doug is sitting on a dead animal. Anyway, let Doug sing to you about Christmas!

Worn by Artist:

Extra-large knit cardigan sweater (1)
Floral tie (1)
Gold chain necklace worn on TOP of shirt and tie (1)
Gold rings (2)
Gold chain bracelet (1)
Off-white corduroy pants (1 pair)
White athletic tube socks (2)
Chins (2)
Uncomfortable smile (1, front of album)
Nathan Lane
-like smirk (1, back of album)

Accessories:

Reading glasses (1)
Inexplicably enormous Bible (1)
Wooden bucket of apples (1)
Rug-sized pelt of indeterminate origin (1)
Christmas-related decorations (none)

Possible Source of Animal Pelt:

Alpaca
Polar Bear
Giant Sheep
Albino Mammoth

Playlist:

Come On, Ring Those Bells
White Christmas
My Holiday Medley (inc. Joy to the World, Angels We Have Heard on High, O Come All Ye Faithful)
Silent Night
Winter Wonderland
Away in a Manger
Wise Men Still Seek Him
Jingle Bells
Christ Is Born

So I’m back. Back to blogging at jasonboyett.com. I started this blog back in 2007 and kept at it until May of 2010 when I moved the blog to Beliefnet. That’s when my latest book, O Me of Little Faith, released, and I renamed the blog to reflect that theme. There, most of my blog posts have revolved around the subjects of faith and doubt and science and religion and big (often unanswered) questions.

The Problem

I posted back in early January that I was feeling some blog burnout, and asked my readers’ advice. Most of you agreed that it would be healthy for me to return to some of the random, fun, personal blogging I used to do before I followed the experts’ advice and focused my blog on a single topic. (Yes, that’s what I was doing with the move to Beliefnet: listening to experts. I had a book out about the subject, so I zeroed in on religious doubt and questions and uncertainty. Which is still a compelling topic for me, but which can be kind of a bummer to immerse yourself in for nine months. In retrospect, upon choosing a laser-focused topic, maybe I should have picked bunnies.)

The Solution

It’s good to listen to your readers, so I have done that. Here’s what’s going to happen from this point on:

1) I’m keeping O Me of Little Faith as a Beliefnet blog but will post there less often. Maybe twice a week. And it will retain a religious focus. You can find a link to it and my most recent post in the sidebar at right. I know a lot of readers appreciate having a place to ask hard questions about faith and religion, and I want to continue to provide that safe forum.

2) I’m re-opening jasonboyett.com as a blog, which you know about already because you’re here. This blog will be a lot more personal than it was prior to the move.

Some Reservations

At its worst, blogging is self-indulgent and narcissistic, and I’m admitting right up front that this is going to be a self-indulgent, narcissistic, super-personal blog. I probably won’t give much advice or try to be too profound here. Instead, I’m going to experiment with something: the assumption that maybe a lot of my readers like my books and blogging not because of any particular subject matter (like doubt, or the afterlife) but because of something else. Maybe it’s my voice —how I write, how I look at the world, and how I engage with the world.

I…I…I…me…me…me.

Yes, I know what they say about assumptions (“they make a SUMPT out of AS and IONS”) but I’m going to assume some of you might be interested in that kind of personal stuff. I’m grateful for those of you who followed me to Beliefnet, but I also realize some of you couldn’t quite get into the subject matter there. Being a writer involves maintaining a robust online presence, and that means I need to keep blogging and interacting with my readers. That’s the best part about blogging, and I truly enjoy it…and that’s coming from a guy who rarely uses the word “truly.” I want to hang out with you folks again.

The Plan

So from here on out I’m just going to focus not on a topic but on, well, me and my life and whatever I’m interested in. And I realize that sentence is such a big pile of blogging self-absorption. My self-editor wants to take that line out. But as uncomfortable as it makes me, I’m embracing it. For instance, a lot of people have asked me to expound on some of the things I post on Twitter about being a dad and my involvement in my kids’ lives. I know that’s of interest to a certain segment of my readers, so you’ll get a lot more of family Jason here. You’ll also hear a lot more about the random things that capture my interest, like the books I’m reading and the races I’m doing and various other shenanigans and photography and stuff like that.

If it works, it works.

If not, then I will blog about bunnies.

Other Housekeeping

Anyway, I’ve kept all my old posts from before the move to Beliefnet. You can find them below. Those published after the move will stay at Beliefnet.

———–

Thanks for reading this far, and welcome to my new blog. I hope it’ll be fun, personal, creative, and less populated by people who want to argue about the end of the world. If you’re the comment-leaving kind, let me know what kinds of stuff you hope to read here. I’ll try to provide, unless the “kinds of stuff you hope to read” involves me writing poetry. I did that in college, but not anymore.